Mandatory Sentencing essays

Mandatory Sentencing essays Crimes in America are growing each day. There are different reasons to the growing of the crimes committed. One big reason that comes to mind is the fact that some criminals are not receiving enough burdens on their punishment. Repeat offenders are currently playing a big role in the growing of the crimes in America. Maybe the penalties that were given in the past are not enough for the potential criminals decision on not doing a crime. In recent years, various mandatory sentencing laws have faced increasing criticism and numerous political or legal challenges. One of the main complaints for the law is that it is too harsh. Many observers criticize mandatory sentences for forcing judges to impose sentences that are too harsh. Some criminals third strike are said to be nonviolent crimes that critics say does not warrant a mandatory twenty five year sentence. For example, a homeless man who was convicted for attempting to break into a church to steal food in nineteen ninety seven and received a three-strike sentence of twenty five years to life. Critics refer back to this over and over. Some legal analysts also blame three strikes laws and other types of mandatory sentences for clogging the court system. It is said that putting all of these criminals into prison is costly. Critics say that mandatory sentences are not justifiable on the basis of cost- effectiveness. The main reason they argue is because of the high cost of imprisoning people. Americans who disagree with the law say that too much of there tax money goes towards prison cost in which the population is still going to raise. The fact that repeat offenders play a big role in growing of the crime rate grabs the attention of many innocent citizens who only want a civilized society. This affects the citizens because it seems that if a person commits a crime and goes to the county jail or prison, that he or she has learned his or her lesson. That is not...